Don't Cry For Reagan...
Paul Krugman's recent article Don't Cry For Reagan made it into the Süddeutsche Zeitung digest of the New York Times. Krugman argues that W. Bush is not an aberation, a derailment of the conservative movement, but an extension of it. He points out that all the nostalgia for the Reagan days is out of place.
Going on a 1993 article which looked back on the 12 years of Reagan and Bush I, he notes how the Reagan administration is similar to the Bush administration:
Going on a 1993 article which looked back on the 12 years of Reagan and Bush I, he notes how the Reagan administration is similar to the Bush administration:
- packing the Department of Environmental Protection with opponents of environmental protection
- privatization and contractors run amok without regulation
- a horrid attourney general (Ed Meese); the politization of the Justice Department
- an administration filled with movement conservative ideologues from the 1960s-1970s for whom government is always the problem and thus see no point in governing well
- thus jobs go to loyal followers, not experts in the field, an apparatchik culture
- the contempt for the rule of law
- Reagan's party still had moderates who kept some of his program in check. (To which I would add that not even the Democrats have been willing to check Bush II).
- Reagan's party never controlled both houses of congress.
- "There was no Reagan-era equivalent of the rush, after 9/11, to give the Bush adminstration whatever it wanted in the name of fighting terrorism."
- The Cold War prevented Reagan from developing the hubris "that led the Bush administration to believe that a splendid little war in Iraq was just the thing to secure his position."
mhatlie - 2. Apr, 16:56
